Acts Chapter Twenty-Five
Read Acts 25:1-12
v.1 “1Now when Festus was come into the province, after three days he
ascended from Caesarea to Jerusalem.”
As we had noted in our
previous study; in A.D. 60 the emperor, Nero, appointed a new governor for
v.2-3 “2Then the high priest and the chief of the Jews informed him against
Paul, and besought him, 3And desired favour against him, that he
would send for him to Jerusalem, laying wait in the way to kill him.”
The chief priests and
principal men (ASV) of the Jews still haven’t forgotten their vow, their hatred
or their purpose to kill Paul. About two
years have passed, they now have a new governor and immediately they lay this
problem at his feet, requesting that Paul be brought to
v.4. “But Festus answered, that Paul should be kept
at Caesarea, and that he himself would depart shortly thither.”
Festus didn’t grant
their request. He simply tells them that
Paul would be kept at
v.5 “5Let them therefore, said he, which among you are able, go down with me, and accuse this man, if there be any wickedness in him.”
Festus not only wasn’t
accepting their request he told the Jewish leaders that whoever among them was
able to come to
v.6 “And
when he had tarried among them more than ten days, he went down unto Caesarea;
and the next day sitting on the judgment seat commanded Paul to be brought.”
Festus spent the time he needed to spend in Jerusalem, Luke records that it was “MORE THAN TEN DAYS” and then went back down to Caesarea. He didn’t waste any time with Paul or the members of the Jewish Council. He took the seat of judgment afforded him as the Roman Governor, sat to hear this case and had Paul brought out to be judged.
v.7 “And when he was come, the Jews which came down
from Jerusalem stood round about, and laid many and grievous complaints against
Paul, which they could not prove.”
Luke doesn’t tell us
what charges that the members of the Sanhedrin made against Paul except to say
that they were “MANY” and “GRIEVOUS”.
Luke also tells us that they could not prove any of the charges that
they made. They were just a bunch of
accusations, nothing that could be substantiated, nothing
that could be proven. This made this
situation readily recognizable as a political situation, not a matter of
criminal conduct of any sort.
v.8 “While he answered for himself, Neither
against the law of the Jews, neither against the temple, nor yet against
Caesar, have I offended any thing at all.”
Paul was allowed to
make his defense. We’re not told
specifically what he presented, just as we’re not told what the Jews presented,
but the sum and substance of the situation was that he had not violated any
law, Roman or Jewish.
v.9 “But
Festus, willing to do the Jews a pleasure, answered Paul, and said, Wilt thou
go up to Jerusalem, and there be judged of these things before me?”
Just like Felix, Festus
wants to gain the cooperation and support of these Jewish leaders and sees a
way to do that. Felix wanted the favor
of the Jews:
Acts 24:27 “But after two years Porcius Festus came into
Felix’ room: and Felix, willing to show the Jews a pleasure, left Paul bound.”
So Festus wasn’t any better in this regard than Felix. In addition he wants Paul to go up to
v.10-11 “Then said Paul, I stand at Caesar’s judgment
seat, where I ought to be judged: to the Jews have I done no wrong, as thou
very well knowest. 11For if I be an offender, or have committed any
thing worthy of death, I refuse not to die: but if there be none of these
things whereof these accuse me, no man may deliver me unto them. I appeal unto
Caesar.”
Paul refuses to go to
Paul then appeals to
the highest court in the
Acts
v.12 “Then
Festus, when he had conferred with the council, answered, Hast thou appealed
unto Caesar? unto Caesar shalt thou go.”
Festus has the
responsibility to render a judgment in this somewhat bizarre case. Paul is innocent of any wrongdoing, Festus
tried to set up something that would please the Jewish leaders and that didn’t
work. So he confers with his council,
the men appointed to advise and assist the governor in many things. These men served the same purpose as
president’s cabinet and that group of White House advisors that support and
advise our president today. They decide
that the only alternative they have is to send Paul to Caesar, but even this
decision continues to present problems.
Read Acts
25:13-27:
v.13 “And after certain days king Agrippa and
Bernice came unto
“AFTER CERTAIN DAYS”,
shortly after Paul’s trial, King Herod Agrippa II and his sister Bernice come
down to Caesarea from Caesarea Philippi.
King Herod Agrippa II was the son of Herod Agrippa I, the Herod who gave
the oration and died in
v.14-15 “And when they had been there many days, Festus
declared Paul’s cause unto the king, saying, There is a certain man left in
bonds by Felix: 15About whom, when I was at Jerusalem, the chief
priests and the elders of the Jews informed me, desiring to have judgment against him.”
Because he is also a
ruler in this region, perhaps with more experience than Festus, but probably
more so because he is at least part Jewish, Festus tells him about his problem
with Paul; a certain man that Felix has left in bonds. We know from prior study that Paul has now
been there for about two years. The
Jewish leaders from
v.16 “To whom I answered, It is not the manner of
the Romans to deliver any man to die, before that he which is accused have the
accusers face to face, and have licence to answer for
himself concerning the crime laid against him.”
Festus did as he should
in this case and required that a Roman trial be conducted to determine what
crimes Paul has committed. As does our
law today Roman law provided the opportunity for those accused to face their
accusers and defend themselves.
v.17 “Therefore, when they were come hither, without
any delay on the morrow I sat on the judgment seat, and commanded the man to be
brought forth.”
When Paul’s accusers
came down from
v.18-19 “Against whom when the accusers stood up, they
brought none accusation of such things as I supposed: 19But had
certain questions against him of their own superstition, and of one Jesus,
which was dead, whom Paul affirmed to be alive.”
At this trial, Festus
learns that Paul is not being charged with any crime against Roman law or any
other civil law but rather the problem is a religious dispute. Religion is translated superstition in the
KJV and the original Greek word can be translated either “pious”, “religious”
or “superstitious. To Festus who is
basically ignorant of the Mosaic Law and God; the main question seems to be the
resurrection of the dead, specifically Jesus the Christ.
v.20-21 “And because I doubted of such manner of
questions, I asked him whether he would go to Jerusalem, and there
be judged of these matters. 21But when Paul had appealed to be
reserved unto the hearing of Augustus, I commanded him to be kept till I might
send him to Caesar.”
Festus doubted the
validity of the charges against Paul; he is in a political bind with the Jewish
rulers. The KJV says that he doubted the
ASV translates that he was perplexed; the RSV says that he was at a loss. He’s got a problem that he has inherited from
Felix and he doesn’t know what to do about it.
He tried to send Paul to
v.22 “Then Agrippa said unto Festus, I would also hear
the man myself. To morrow, said he, thou shalt hear
him.”
So
perhaps as a courtesy to Festus, perhaps because of his own curiosity since he
was a Jew, Agrippa agrees to hear Paul’s case.
v.23 “And on the morrow, when Agrippa was come, and
Bernice, with great pomp, and was entered into the place of hearing, with the
chief captains, and principal men of the city, at Festus’ commandment Paul was
brought forth.”
Festus keeps his
promise. Arrangements are made and on
the very next day all the court with all the pomp and ceremony worthy of some
great event they gather to hear Paul.
Not only are Festus, Agrippa and Bernice there but also all the chief
captains and principal men of the city of
v.24-25 “And Festus said, King Agrippa, and all men
which are here present with us, ye see this man, about whom all the multitude
of the Jews have dealt with me, both at Jerusalem, and also here, crying that he ought not to live any longer. 25But
when I found that he had committed nothing worthy of death, and that he himself
hath appealed to Augustus, I have determined to send him.”
This man Paul is one
whom the Jewish leaders want condemned and executed but Festus in his judgment
has found nothing to warrant punishment.
Paul has appealed to Caesar and Festus has determined to send him but
now he has a major problem in doing that:
v.26-27 “Of whom I have no certain thing to write unto
my lord. Wherefore I have brought him forth before you, and specially
before thee, O king Agrippa, that, after examination had, I might have somewhat
to write. 27For it seemeth to me unreasonable to send a prisoner,
and not withal to signify the crimes laid against him.”
This is Festus’ real
problem. He has to send Paul to